Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-5396
02-23-2012
HAROLD C. WILSON Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al. Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 22md day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant, R. Seth Williams, to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc, 96) and Plaintiff's Response thereto, for the reasons provided in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 96) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;
2. Insofar as Defendant's Motion requests that any and all state law claims against Defendant Williams be dismissed, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED;
3. Insofar as Defendant's Motion requests that Plaintiff's claims against Mr, Williams be dismissed as time-barred and for lack of Mr. Williams' personal involvement, Defendant's Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
______________________
L. FELIPE RESTREPO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE