From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Cisnerous

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
21-cv-07393-HSG (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-07393-HSG

09-29-2021

DAVID W. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. THERESA CISNEROUS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF TRANSFER

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, an inmate housed at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II ("CSATF"), filed thispro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that CSATF warden Theresa Cisnerous, CSATF, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and the Office of Grievance appeals coordinators Zamora and Shaw have violated his constitutional rights by failing to address conditions that put him at risk for contracting CO`VTD-19, such as overcrowding and difficulty maintaining six feet distance between inmates. Dkt. No. 1. The events or omissions giving rise to the claim(s) occurred at CSATF, which is located in Kings County, which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Venue therefore properly lies in the Eastern District. See Id. § 1391(b). Neither the complaint's focus on medical issues nor Plata authorizes venue in this district. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, in the interest of justice and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this action be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Cisnerous

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
21-cv-07393-HSG (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Wilson v. Cisnerous

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. THERESA CISNEROUS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

21-cv-07393-HSG (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)