From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Cameron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 11, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7345 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7345

02-11-2013

DAVID PEPE WILSON, Petitioner, v. KENNETH R. CAMERON, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 11 day of Feb, 2013, upon independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 1), the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 22), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated August 31, 2012) IT IS ORDERED that:

1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and

3. there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

______________

BERLE M. SCHILLER, J.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Cameron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 11, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7345 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. Cameron

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PEPE WILSON, Petitioner, v. KENNETH R. CAMERON, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7345 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2013)