From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Brazzeal

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 14, 1940
9 S.E.2d 717 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)

Opinion

28155.

DECIDED JUNE 14, 1940.

Damages; from Decatur superior court — Judge Worrill presiding. October 7, 1939.

John E. Drake, for plaintiff in error.

G. G. Bower, Vance Custer, contra.


An approved brief of evidence is indispensable to the consideration of a motion for new trial. When a motion for new trial was assigned for hearing, and no one representing the movant appeared at such hearing, and no brief of evidence was filed or approved with the motion, it was not error for the court to dismiss the motion.

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. Gardner, J., disqualified.

DECIDED JUNE, 14, 1940.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Brazzeal

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 14, 1940
9 S.E.2d 717 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
Case details for

Wilson v. Brazzeal

Case Details

Full title:WILSON v. BRAZZEAL, administratrix

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 14, 1940

Citations

9 S.E.2d 717 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
62 Ga. App. 693

Citing Cases

Powell v. Powell

The judgment of the trial court denying a new trial must be affirmed. Smith v. State, 62 Ga. App. 733(3) (9…

Grant v. State Highway Department

further provided that the movant should have until the final hearing of the case whenever it may be had to…