From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Bayolo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Oct 12, 2017
CASE NO. 5:17-cv-221-MCR-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 12, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:17-cv-221-MCR-GRJ

10-12-2017

STEVE WILSON, Plaintiff, v. JUAN CARLOS BAYOLO, et al., Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff initiated this case by filing a Complaint, ECF No. 1. Because the Complaint exceeded the page limits set forth in Florida Northern District Local Rule 5.7(B), the Court ordered the Complaint stricken. ECF No. 3. In addition, Plaintiff failed to either pay the civil case filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper with supporting documentation. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint and either pay the civil rights filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper on or before September 16, 2017. The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed without further notice. Id.

As of this date, Plaintiff has neither complied nor sought an extension of time to comply. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case should be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the Court.

IN CHAMBERS this 12th day of October 2017.

/s/_________

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only , and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. If a party fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations as to any particular claim or issue contained in a report and recommendation, that party waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on the unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Bayolo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Oct 12, 2017
CASE NO. 5:17-cv-221-MCR-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Wilson v. Bayolo

Case Details

Full title:STEVE WILSON, Plaintiff, v. JUAN CARLOS BAYOLO, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Oct 12, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 5:17-cv-221-MCR-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 12, 2017)