From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALL AS DIVISION
Sep 18, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-4636-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-4636-M-BN

2013-09-18

GEORGE E. WILSON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 1, 2013, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 5] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Plaintiffs' claims based on: (1) anticipatory breach of contract based on Bank of America's alleged lack of authority to appoint a substitute trustee; (2) breach of contract; (3) fraud; (4) violations of the Texas Property Code; (5) violations of the Texas Finance Code based on the alleged failure of Bank of America, BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P., and BONY to obtain bonds, and violations of the Texas Business and Commerce Code based on the alleged failure of Bank of America, BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P., and BONY to obtain bonds; and (6) an accounting, are all dismissed without prejudice, and Plaintiff may amend within 21 days of the date of this Order to attempt to state those claims properly. If no such amendment is filed, the Court will dismiss those claims with prejudice without further notice.

The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiffs' claims based on (1) violations of the Texas Finance Code based on Bank of America's alleged lack of authority to appoint a substitute trustee and (2) violations of the Texas Business and Commerce Code Violation based on Bank of America's alleged lack of authority to appoint a substitute trustee.

______________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXA


Summaries of

Wilson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALL AS DIVISION
Sep 18, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-4636-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE E. WILSON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALL AS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 18, 2013

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-4636-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Whittier v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Deutsche Bank is entitled to foreclose pursuant to the Deed of Trust also. Plaintiffs argue that MERS did not…

Valdez v. SunTrust Mortg., Inc.

See id. (citing TEX. PROP. CODE § 51.0001(4)(A)). Under the Deed of Trust, MERS has the authority to assign…