From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Bachman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 25, 2011
27 A.3d 987 (Pa. 2011)

Opinion

2011-08-25

Anne WILSON, Appellantv.Honorable Patricia M. BACHMAN, and Honeywell, Inc., and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Appellees.


No. 70 MAP 2010, Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania at No. 385 M.D. 2010, dated October 26, 2010.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2011, it appearing that Appellant has failed to raise any argument of merit, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dismissing Appellant's appeal as moot is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Bachman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 25, 2011
27 A.3d 987 (Pa. 2011)
Case details for

Wilson v. Bachman

Case Details

Full title:Anne WILSON, Appellantv.Honorable Patricia M. BACHMAN, and Honeywell…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

27 A.3d 987 (Pa. 2011)