From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson Transit Co. v. Fairchild Milling Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 15, 1937
89 F.2d 1023 (6th Cir. 1937)

Opinion

No. 7202.

April 15, 1937.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Jones, Judge.

Duncan, Leckie, McCreary and Schlitz Hinslea, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

McKeehan, Merrick, Arter Stewart, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.


The court being of opinion that there was substantial evidence on which to submit this cause to the jury, and that no error prejudicial to the appellant was committed by the trial court in its charge to the jury or in refusing to charge the jury as requested by appellant, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.


Summaries of

Wilson Transit Co. v. Fairchild Milling Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 15, 1937
89 F.2d 1023 (6th Cir. 1937)
Case details for

Wilson Transit Co. v. Fairchild Milling Co.

Case Details

Full title:The WILSON TRANSIT COMPANY, Appellant, v. The FAIRCHILD MILLING COMPANY…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 15, 1937

Citations

89 F.2d 1023 (6th Cir. 1937)