From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilmshurst v. Lockyer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2006
CIV-S-06-0308 DFL PAN (GGH) PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)

Opinion

CIV-S-06-0308 DFL PAN (GGH) PS.

August 7, 2006


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed June 22, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within ten days, why his action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) (service of summons on defendants). The ten day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Wilmshurst v. Lockyer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2006
CIV-S-06-0308 DFL PAN (GGH) PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Wilmshurst v. Lockyer

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD E. WILMSHURST, Plaintiff, v. BILL LOCKYER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 7, 2006

Citations

CIV-S-06-0308 DFL PAN (GGH) PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)