From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilmshurst v. Lockyer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2008
CIV-S-06-308 RRB EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2008)

Opinion

CIV-S-06-308 RRB EFB PS.

February 1, 2008


ORDER


On August 7, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed August 7, 2006, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Wilmshurst v. Lockyer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2008
CIV-S-06-308 RRB EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Wilmshurst v. Lockyer

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD E. WILMSHURST, Plaintiff, v. BILL LOCKYER et al.,. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2008

Citations

CIV-S-06-308 RRB EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2008)