Opinion
2:17-cv-01775-JCM-BNW
01-10-2022
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS TRUSTEE FOR STANWICH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST A, Plaintiff, v. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 9338 WILDERNESS GLEN AVENUE; YELLOWSTONE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendants. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 9338 WILDERNESS GLEN AVENUE, Counterclaimant, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS TRUSTEE FOR STANWICH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST A, Counter-Defendant.
ROBERT RIETHER ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ACE SECURITIES CORP., HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2006-FM2, ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 9338 WILDERNESS GLEN AVENUE
ROBERT RIETHER ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ACE SECURITIES CORP., HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2006-FM2, ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 9338 WILDERNESS GLEN AVENUE
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENT TO PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust A (“Wilmington”) and Defendant/Counterclaimant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9338 Wilderness Glen Avenue (“Saticoy”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, by and through their respective attorneys of records, hereby agree and stipulate as follows.
1. Wilmington filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying its Motion for Summary Judgment & Granting Saticoy Bay's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 48) [ECF No. 59] (“Motion”) on August 23, 2019;
2. After full briefing, this Court filed its Order Granting Wilmington's Motion [ECF 70] on February 5, 2020;
3. Saticoy filed its Notice of Appeal [ECF 87] on April 20, 2020;
4. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded this case [ECF 95] on November 17, 2021;
5. This Court filed its Order setting the supplemental briefing schedule regarding Wilmington's Motion [ECF 99] (“Order”) on December 29, 2021;
6. The Order set Wilmington's deadline to file its supplement to its Motion as January 12, 2022, with Saticoy's reply due within seven days thereafter;
7. Wilmington is requesting an extension until February 2, 2021 to file it supplement to its Motion with Saticoy's reply due within seven days thereafter;
8. This extension is requested based on the recently completed the holiday season and the fact that the previous handling attorney, Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq., is no longer with Plaintiff's counsel (ECF No. 100);
9. Additionally, counsel for Saticoy has contracted COVID-19, which has caused additional related delays.
10. Counsel for Saticoy does not oppose the extension;
11. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.