From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilmer v. Salkind

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 30, 2022
290 A.3d 709 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022)

Summary

In Lear, this Court concluded that the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas COVID-19 emergency orders categorized the suspension of Rule 600 as court postponements.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Shabazz

Opinion

No. 1220 EDA 2022

12-30-2022

Emma WILMER, Appellant v. Gene Z. SALKIND, M.D., Todd Anthony Burlingame, D.O., Holy Redeemer Health System, Holy Redeemer Hospital, Huntingdon Valley Anesthesiology Associates



Affirmed.


Summaries of

Wilmer v. Salkind

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 30, 2022
290 A.3d 709 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022)

In Lear, this Court concluded that the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas COVID-19 emergency orders categorized the suspension of Rule 600 as court postponements.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Shabazz

In Lear, supra, this Court discussed the implications of the COVID-19 related statewide judicial orders suspending Rule 600.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Lowry
Case details for

Wilmer v. Salkind

Case Details

Full title:Emma WILMER, Appellant v. Gene Z. SALKIND, M.D., Todd Anthony Burlingame…

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Dec 30, 2022

Citations

290 A.3d 709 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022)

Citing Cases

In re E.A.

Commonwealth v. Lear, 290 A.3d 709, 715 (Pa. Super. 2023) (citations omitted), appeal granted on other…

Commonwealth v. Shabazz

Omar Shabazz appeals from the judgment of sentence, entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery…