From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wills v. Wills

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1971
269 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1971)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1971

Decided February 18, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, L. BARRON HILL, J.

Edward K. Blodnick for appellant.

Louis J. Castellano, Jr. for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. We agree with the conclusions of the dissenter at the Appellate Division that the execution of the power of attorney, claimed by respondent to constitute part performance sufficient to remove the bar of the Statute of Frauds, was not unequivocally referable to the contract asserted, and that the mere failure on the part of the appellant to carry out the supposed bargain could not give rise to an inference of fraud excusing the application of the statute.

The order appealed from should be reversed, the complaint dismissed and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for determination of the counterclaim, without costs.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON concur; Judge BURKE taking no part.

Order reversed, without costs, and case remitted to Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.


Summaries of

Wills v. Wills

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1971
269 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1971)
Case details for

Wills v. Wills

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WILLS, Respondent, v. DOROTHY E. WILLS, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 18, 1971

Citations

269 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1971)
269 N.E.2d 40
320 N.Y.S.2d 251

Citing Cases

STEIN v. ROBB

However, such agreements must meet the strictures of the Statute of Frauds. The Court of Appeals decision in…

Lebowitz v. Mingus

Given the conclusory character of the fraud claim, the contradictory nature of the oral promises attributed…