From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willow Land Co. v. Goldschmidt

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Sep 10, 1909
11 Cal.App. 297 (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)

Opinion

Civ. No. 668.

September 10, 1909.

MOTION of respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, dismissing an appeal from the Justice's Court of Huntington Beach Township. Z. B. West, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

S. S. Sanders, for Appellant.

R. Y. Williams, for Respondents.


This purports to be an appeal from an order made by the superior court of Orange county dismissing an appeal had and taken to that court from the justice's court of Huntington Beach township.

The action as brought in the justice's court appears to have been for the recovery of certain personal property of the alleged value of $144, and damages claimed for the detention thereof in the sum of $155.99.

The appeal must be dismissed upon several grounds: 1. There is no authentication of the record by bill of exceptions or otherwise, in the absence of which the documents and papers printed in the transcript constitute no record which can be reviewed by this court. 2. The appeal is ineffectual by reason of the fact that neither the undertaking on appeal nor deposit prescribed by section 941, Code of Civil Procedure, has been given or made, nor was there any waiver thereof. 3. The amount involved being less than $300, this court has no jurisdiction thereof on appeal. (Const., art. VI, sec. 4.) 4. Other reasons.

The appeal is dismissed without the imposition of penalty.

Allen, P. J., and Taggart, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Willow Land Co. v. Goldschmidt

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Sep 10, 1909
11 Cal.App. 297 (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
Case details for

Willow Land Co. v. Goldschmidt

Case Details

Full title:WILLOW LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. MAX GOLDSCHMIDT and M…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Sep 10, 1909

Citations

11 Cal.App. 297 (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
104 P. 841

Citing Cases

Lincoln County Bank v. Fetterman

In the absence of proper authentication there is presented no record upon the appeal from the order denying…

Couldthirst v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.

The case, of course, is distinguishable from such decisions as City of Madera v. Black, 181 Cal. 306, [184 P.…