From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILLIS v. WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
May 1, 2007
CASE NO. 5:06cv261/RS (N.D. Fla. May. 1, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:06cv261/RS.

May 1, 2007


ORDER


Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) and Petitioner's Objections To Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). I have reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo. Petitioner has previously filed a petition pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which was denied. Petitioner is not entitled to file a successive § 2255 petition because he does not allege that his claim is based upon a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which overturned Eleventh Circuit precedent.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 8) is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and 28 U.S.C. § 2243.
3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

WILLIS v. WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
May 1, 2007
CASE NO. 5:06cv261/RS (N.D. Fla. May. 1, 2007)
Case details for

WILLIS v. WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY C. WILLIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: May 1, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 5:06cv261/RS (N.D. Fla. May. 1, 2007)