From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. Tingey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2006
No. 06-cv-0242-MCE-JFM-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2006)

Opinion

No. 06-cv-0242-MCE-JFM-PS.

August 8, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On May 5, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within ten (10) days. Plaintiff has filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 5, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's February 28, 2006 Motion to Dismiss is granted.


Summaries of

Willis v. Tingey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2006
No. 06-cv-0242-MCE-JFM-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Willis v. Tingey

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE M. WILLIS, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TINGEY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 8, 2006

Citations

No. 06-cv-0242-MCE-JFM-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2006)