From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. State

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Jan 15, 2014
No. 07-13-00418-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2014)

Opinion

No. 07-13-00418-CR

01-15-2014

TERRY WAYNE WILLIS, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


On Appeal from the 251st District Court

Potter County, Texas

Trial Court No. 67430-C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appearing pro se, appellant Terry Wayne Willis filed a document entitled "notice of appeal" with the district clerk under cause number 67,430-C. It was forwarded to this court on November 27, 2013, accompanied by the clerk's information form. According to the information form, in cause number 67,430-C Willis is charged with evading arrest or detention. The form indicates a sentence has not been imposed because the case is "still pending." It further states the trial court has not certified a right of appeal.

Questioning our jurisdiction, we abated the appeal on our own initiative and offered Willis and the State an opportunity to respond. Neither responded. The clerk of this court subsequently contacted the trial court coordinator on the status of cause number 67,430-C. According to the court coordinator, the case is not yet set for trial.

Willis was the defendant in another case in the 251st District Court, trial court cause number 65,359-C. That case has been tried. Willis's appeal from the judgment in that case is pending here, our number 07-13-0417-CR. That appeal is not affected by this order.

Generally, in a criminal law matter an appellate court's jurisdiction is limited to consideration of a final judgment of conviction. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (citing Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961)). There are a few narrow exceptions to this rule, but none are shown to be applicable here. See McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161 (noting exceptions). And unless expressly granted by law, we have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders of the trial court. Id. Finally, a notice of appeal filed prematurely before the trial court makes a finding of guilt or receives a jury verdict is not effective. TEX. R. APP. P. 27.1(b).

Finding no basis for the exercise of our appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss Willis's attempted appeal of trial court cause number 67,430-C for want of jurisdiction.

James T. Campbell

Justice
Do not publish.


Summaries of

Willis v. State

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Jan 15, 2014
No. 07-13-00418-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Willis v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRY WAYNE WILLIS, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Date published: Jan 15, 2014

Citations

No. 07-13-00418-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2014)