From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 29, 2001
50 S.W.3d 319 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78455

June 29, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE DENNIS SCHAUMANN.

Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa Sutherland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Appellant Damon Willis ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the judgment or sentence. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion as he was deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Willis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 29, 2001
50 S.W.3d 319 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Willis v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAMON WILLIS, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jun 29, 2001

Citations

50 S.W.3d 319 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)