From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. Premo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 6, 2015
Case No. 6:13 CV01529-CL (D. Or. Jan. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 6:13 CV01529-CL

01-06-2015

SHANE DEON WILLIS, Petitioner, v. JEFF PREMO, Respondent.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 2, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist, 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 6th of January, 2015.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Willis v. Premo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 6, 2015
Case No. 6:13 CV01529-CL (D. Or. Jan. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Willis v. Premo

Case Details

Full title:SHANE DEON WILLIS, Petitioner, v. JEFF PREMO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 6, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:13 CV01529-CL (D. Or. Jan. 6, 2015)