From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis of Colo. Inc. v. Troice

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 18, 2013
568 U.S. 1140 (2013)

Opinion

No. 12–86.

2013-01-18

WILLIS OF COLORADO INCORPORATED, et al., petitioners, v. Samuel TROICE, et al.


Consolidated with Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice, No. 12–88, 133 S.Ct. 978.

Case below, Roland v. Green, 675 F.3d 503.

Motion of Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, LLP for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of DRI–The Voice of the Defense Bar for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in No. 12–79 granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in No. 12–86 granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in No. 12–88 granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.


Summaries of

Willis of Colo. Inc. v. Troice

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 18, 2013
568 U.S. 1140 (2013)
Case details for

Willis of Colo. Inc. v. Troice

Case Details

Full title:WILLIS OF COLORADO INCORPORATED, et al., petitioners, v. Samuel TROICE, et…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

568 U.S. 1140 (2013)
568 U.S. 1140
184 L. Ed. 2d 758
81 U.S.L.W. 3405

Citing Cases

Spectrum Select, L.P. v. Tremont Grp. Holdings, Inc. (In re Tremont Sec. Law, State Law, & Ins. Litig.)

Plaintiffs do not seriously contend that dismissal on this basis is not appropriate. Rather, they move for…

Chadbourne & Parke Llp v. Troice

CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP, petitioner, v. Samuel TROICE, et al.Consolidated with Willis of Colorado Inc. v.…