From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willington v. Irving Trust Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 5, 1932
142 Misc. 627 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)

Opinion

February 5, 1932.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Paul E. Mead, for the appellant.

Louis Fabricant, for the respondent.


Neither Taylor's power of attorney to Smith given in connection with Taylor's account in the Mechanics and Metals Bank nor Smith's limited authority to indorse checks for deposit in the National City Bank authorized him to execute a general indorsement. ( Standard Steam Specialty Co. v. Corn Exchange Bank, 220 N.Y. 478; Schmidt v. Garfield National Bank, 64 Hun, 298; affd., 138 N.Y. 631.) Such authority, moreover, cannot be implied from the fact that Smith on some other occasions indorsed checks in Taylor's name and misapplied the proceeds, since this was done without Taylor's knowledge or consent. ( People v. Bank of North America, 75 N.Y. 547.) The indorsement on the check deposited in the defendant trust company was, therefore, forged and the defendant was justified in deducting the amount from the plaintiff's assignor's account.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, LEVY, CALLAHAN and UNTERMYER, JJ.


Summaries of

Willington v. Irving Trust Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 5, 1932
142 Misc. 627 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
Case details for

Willington v. Irving Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:VIOLET G. WILLINGTON, Respondent, v. IRVING TRUST COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1932

Citations

142 Misc. 627 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
255 N.Y.S. 186

Citing Cases

Kay v. County of Wayne

The power of an agent to indorse cannot be implied from the fact that the agent, without the knowledge or…