From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willingham v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jan 25, 2005
Civil Action No. 02-1972 (ESH/JMF) (D.D.C. Jan. 25, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 02-1972 (ESH/JMF).

January 25, 2005


ORDER


In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion issued simultaneously herewith, it is, hereby, ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Expand Scope of Discovery Order Dated July 20, 2004 and to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Request for Production of Documents [# 43] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
2. Plaintiff's Supplement to Motion to Expand Scope of Discovery Order Dated July 20, 2004 and to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Request for Production of Documents [# 44] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
3. Defendant's Motion to Quash Subpoena and to Enter a Protective Order Vacating Plaintiff's Notice of Deposition to Former Drug Enforcement Administrator Donnie Marshall [#51] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, provided, however, that the deposition of Marshall may not take more than four hours and plaintiff may not ask Marshall any questions to which he previously replied under oath while testifying before the Merit Systems Protection Board; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
4. Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum to Plaintiff's Motion to Expand Scope of Discovery Dated July 20, 2004 and to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Request for Production of Documents [#55] is DENIED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
5. Plaintiff's Motion to Late File Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Documents [#58] is GRANTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
6. The defendant shall produce for the Court's in camera inspection all documents it claims to be privileged within 7 days of the date of this Order; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
7. The defendant shall supplement its discovery responses in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion within 7 days of the date of this Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Willingham v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jan 25, 2005
Civil Action No. 02-1972 (ESH/JMF) (D.D.C. Jan. 25, 2005)
Case details for

Willingham v. Ashcroft

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA J. WILLINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jan 25, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 02-1972 (ESH/JMF) (D.D.C. Jan. 25, 2005)