From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamsville Cent. v. Cannon Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 10, 1989
148 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

March 10, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to appellants, in accordance with the following memorandum: The order is modified by directing that plaintiff and defendant Celotex shall be required to produce only so much of their experts' reports as contain factual data relating to the roof at the Williamsville East High School (see, McKinstry v Werner Mach. Co., 133 A.D.2d 361; Rogowski v. Day Co., 130 Misc.2d 801; see also, Stevens v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 117 A.D.2d 733; Anastasia v. Barnes, 109 A.D.2d 769; Terwilliger v Leach Co., 88 A.D.2d 910: Kraus v. Ford Motor Co., 38 A.D.2d 680).


Summaries of

Williamsville Cent. v. Cannon Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 10, 1989
148 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Williamsville Cent. v. Cannon Partnership

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant, v. CANNON PARTNERSHIP et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1989

Citations

148 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)