From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamsville Cent. Sch. v. N.Y. St. Urban

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: To be entitled to summary judgment with respect to its fourth affirmative defense and counterclaim, defendant was obligated to establish, by proof in admissible form, that it retained no interest in the property for which plaintiff seeks payment of Tax Revenue Impact Payments (see, Williamsville Cent. School Dist. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 142 A.D.2d 981; see also, McKinney's Uncons Laws of N Y § 6253 [8]; § 6255 [29] [New York State Urban Development Corporation Act § 3 (8); § 5 (29); L 1968, ch 174, § 1, as amended]). We find that defendant failed to meet that burden, and summary judgment was properly denied.


Summaries of

Williamsville Cent. Sch. v. N.Y. St. Urban

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Williamsville Cent. Sch. v. N.Y. St. Urban

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE URBAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 938