From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Williamson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 17, 1977
547 F.2d 811 (4th Cir. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1543.

Argued December 8, 1976.

Decided January 17, 1977.

Francis N. Crenshaw, Norfolk, Va. (William E. McCardell, Jr., Crenshaw, Ware Johnson, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Robert G. Doumar, Norfolk, Va. (Doumar, Pincus, Knight Harlan, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Before CRAVEN, WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges.


Carroll Mac Williamson sued his half sister, Evelyn Byrd Williamson, in the district court to set aside a family agreement that determined the boundary line between lands inherited under the will of their father. In a carefully prepared opinion, 407 F. Supp. 370 (E.D.Va. 1976), the district judge held that the boundary-line agreement was valid as a family settlement of a dispute over the interpretation of the will and that the agreement, under Virginia law applicable to this diversity jurisdiction case, effectively conveyed any interest which Carroll Mac Williamson may have had to the tract in dispute and effectively barred the plaintiff from asserting claim to the property. We agree, and affirm for the reasons stated by Judge Clarke.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Williamson v. Williamson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 17, 1977
547 F.2d 811 (4th Cir. 1977)
Case details for

Williamson v. Williamson

Case Details

Full title:CARROLL M. WILLIAMSON, JR., APPELLANT v. EVELYN BYRD WILLIAMSON ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 17, 1977

Citations

547 F.2d 811 (4th Cir. 1977)

Citing Cases

In re Conley

The clear language of the agreement explains its intent was to establish boundaries so that the bank would be…

Conley v. Conley

The clear language of the agreement explains its intent was to establish boundaries so that the bank would be…