Opinion
No. 4-04-00651-CR
Delivered and Filed: October 19, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appeal from the 386th Judicial Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2003-CR-2542, Honorable Laura Parker, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.
Sitting: Sarah B. DUNCAN, Justice, Karen ANGELINI, Justice, Sandee Bryan MARION, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 29, 2003, after a trial on the merits, Quinton Ramon Williamson was found guilty of aggravated assault and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment and a fine of $1,500.00. His sentence was then suspended, and he was placed on community supervision for a period of ten years. On January 20, 2004, the State filed a motion to revoke Williamson's community supervision, arguing that he had violated the conditions and terms of his community supervision. On August 9, 2004, at the revocation hearing, Williamson pled true to violating the terms and conditions of his community supervision. The trial court revoked his community supervision and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment and a fine of $1,500.00. Williamson timely filed a notice of appeal. Williamson's court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a brief in which he raises two arguable issues, but nonetheless concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Williamson did not file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. 1.