Williamson v. State

Full title: DANIELLE S. WILLIAMSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 18, 2020

310 So. 3d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2D19-3481

09-18-2020

Danielle S. WILLIAMSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Danielle Williamson appeals from the sentence imposed following the revocation of her probation. We affirm in all respects without comment. With regard to Williamson's claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance, our affirmance is without prejudice to Williamson raising that issue in a timely filed Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. See McClough v. State, 74 So. 3d 158, 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.