From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 31, 1998
505 S.E.2d 844 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

A98A0976.

DECIDED AUGUST 31, 1998.

Robbery. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Long.

Steven E. Phillips, for appellant.

Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Defendant and his co-defendant brother were jointly tried before a jury for committing an armed robbery. The jury found defendant guilty of robbery by intimidation and his co-defendant guilty of armed robbery. Defendant filed this appeal after the denial of his motion for new trial. Held:

Defendant contends the trial court should have severed his case from that of his co-defendant brother, arguing that proof of his co-defendant brother's commission of a prior armed robbery prejudiced his defense. We do not agree. The prior similar transaction evidence at issue did not implicate defendant at all. "The trial court gave appropriate limiting instructions to the jury, cautioning that the evidence could be considered only in regard to [defendant's co-defendant brother. Under such circumstances, we find] no error." Hannah v. State, 261 Ga. 336, 337 (2, b) ( 404 S.E.2d 440) (1991).

Judgment affirmed. Blackburn and Eldridge, JJ., concur.


DECIDED AUGUST 31, 1998.


Summaries of

Williamson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 31, 1998
505 S.E.2d 844 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Williamson v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMSON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Aug 31, 1998

Citations

505 S.E.2d 844 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
234 Ga. App. 146

Citing Cases

Graham v. State

Accordingly, his complaint has no basis. See Williamson v. State, 234 Ga. App. 146 ( 505 S.E.2d 845) (1998).…