From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Dep't of the Treasury

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
21-cv-06232-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-06232-PJH

09-27-2021

JOSEPH WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner in Texas proceeding pro se, filed a civil action. Plaintiff was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and he was allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice. Twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not submitted any filing or otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williamson v. Dep't of the Treasury

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
21-cv-06232-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Williamson v. Dep't of the Treasury

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

21-cv-06232-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)