From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Continental Filter Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1898
34 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

November Term, 1898.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J. Patterson, O'Brien, Ingraham and McLaughlin JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs on the opinion of the court below.


The following is the opinion of the court below:


The plaintiff is the holder and in possession of and produces upon the trial of this action a certificate transferring to him absolutely and as the unqualified owner sixty-nine shares of the capital stock of the above-named defendant company, and seeks to compel said company to transfer said stock to him upon its books. The defendants, and principally, it appears, the defendant Anderson, dispute his right to have said stock so transferred, claiming that he holds the same as security and not as an absolute owner. A somewhat involved explanation has been offered by the evidence of the defendants to sustain such theory of security or qualified ownership. After considering the same, however, in the light of plaintiff's evidence contradicting such theory and in the light of the prima facie right which plaintiff has up n the face of the certificate to have it transferred to him, I am of the opinion that the latter has established his right to the relief claimed and that he should have judgment compelling such transfer, etc. Findings or decision and judgment in accordance herewith, with costs against both defendants, may be prepared by plaintiff, and, if not satisfactory in form to defendants, they may submit amendments.


Summaries of

Williamson v. Continental Filter Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1898
34 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

Williamson v. Continental Filter Company

Case Details

Full title:David Williamson, Respondent, v. Continental Filter Company, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1898

Citations

34 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Citing Cases

Hannahs v. Hammond Typewriter Co.

This evidence was excluded under an objection that the evidence offered was incompetent, irrelevant and…