From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:21-cv-1210 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1210 KJM CKD P

12-29-2021

VANESSA KAY WILLIAMSON, Petitioner, v. DARRYL ADAMS, Respondent.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 12, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss within thirty days or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Williamson v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:21-cv-1210 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Williamson v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:VANESSA KAY WILLIAMSON, Petitioner, v. DARRYL ADAMS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1210 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)