From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 1989
548 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

granting motion to strike appellant's brief where appellant's statement of the case and facts was unduly argumentative and the citations to the record were inadequate

Summary of this case from Gladstone v. Smith

Opinion

No. 89-356.

September 8, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, John M. McNatt, J.

John P. Stone, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Rutledge Liles and David Etheridge, Jacksonville, for appellee Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Samuel H. Lanier, Jacksonville, for appellee Carr-Tech Industries, Inc.


ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE INITIAL BRIEF


Appellee has moved to strike the initial brief of appellant as violative of Rule 9.210, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We agree that the statement of the case and facts is unduly argumentative and contains matters immaterial and impertinent to the controversy between the parties. Additionally, the index to the brief lists nine points on appeal, but in the argument section, appellant fails to specifically denominate these nine points to provide for "argument with regard to each issue" as required by Rule 9.210(b)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Accordingly, we grant the motion to strike.

We write to call attention to the fact that the citations to the record contained in the initial brief are also inadequate. Rule 9.210(b)(3), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, requires references to the appropriate pages of the record or transcript. Appellant's statement of the case and facts fails to comply with this rule. For example, appellant uses three pages to summarize the testimony he gave at trial. There is not one reference to the record throughout those three pages. At the end of the summary of the testimony, appellant has a parenthetical reference which states "Williams' testimony, as stated above, is at transcript volume 1, page 94, line 22 to page 160, line 12." One citation to 66 pages of testimony to support three pages of factual recitation is inadequate for purposes of review of the merits of this appeal.

Appellee's motion to strike is granted. Appellant shall serve an amended initial brief within ten days which deletes all legal argument contained in the statement of the case and facts, specifically denominates the nine points on appeal in the argument section of the brief and makes pinpoint citations to the record on appeal to substantiate each statement made in the brief.

JOANOS, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 1989
548 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

granting motion to strike appellant's brief where appellant's statement of the case and facts was unduly argumentative and the citations to the record were inadequate

Summary of this case from Gladstone v. Smith

striking Williams' initial brief because it was unduly argumentative and contained matters immaterial and impertinent to the controversy between the parties

Summary of this case from Greenfield v. Westmoreland
Case details for

Williams v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., A CORPORATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 8, 1989

Citations

548 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Greenfield v. Westmoreland

The Statement of the Case and the Facts is unduly argumentative and contains matters immaterial and…

White v. White

In short, the brief is of no assistance whatsoever to this court. There can be little question regarding…