From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Williams

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 220 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Opinion

(Fall Riding, 1802.)

An answer may be amended on motion.

Haywood moved for leave to amend the answer, and insisted it was agreeable to the practice, and had been done in many instances.


took time to advise; and the cause of Wilcox's Executors v. McLaine coming on in the meantime, in which was read an amended answer, he said, at another day the answer may be amended.

NOTE. — See Barnes v. Hill, post, 236; Anonymous, post, 352; Benzien v. Lovelace, 1 N.C.; Arendell v. Blackwell, 16 N.C. 354; Tomlinson v. Savage, 22 N.C. 68.

Cited: Graham v. Skinner, 57 N.C. 99.


Summaries of

Williams v. Williams

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 220 (N.C. Super. 1802)
Case details for

Williams v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1802

Citations

3 N.C. 220 (N.C. Super. 1802)