Williams v. Williams

2 Citing cases

  1. Old Hattiesburg High, L.P. v. Harris Constr. Servs.

    No. 2023-CA-00579-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Sep. 3, 2024)

    Standard of Review ¶31. "Generally, only final judgments are appealable." Williams v. Williams, 347 So.3d 178, 182 (¶14) (Miss. 2022) (quoting M.W.F. v. D.D.F., 926 So.2d 897, 899 (¶4) (Miss. 2006)). "An appeal may be taken only from a final judgment," which is one that "adjudicates the merits of the controversy and settles all issues between all parties."

  2. Melton v. Union Hill Missionary Baptist Church

    377 So. 3d 974 (Miss. 2024)   Cited 1 times

    Id. (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting McNeil v. Hester, 753 So. 2d 1057, 1063 (Miss. 2000)). Williams v. Williams, 347 So. 3d 178, 181 (Miss. 2022). ¶13. Melton’s jurisdictional argument is conflicting and confusing.