From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Wilkinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
May 26, 2016
No. CIV 13-206-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. May. 26, 2016)

Opinion

No. CIV 13-206-RAW-SPS

05-26-2016

MARIO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. TIM WILKINSON and BRIAN WIDEMAN, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff appealed the Opinion and Order dismissing this action to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court reversed and remanded for further proceedings concerning Plaintiff's (1) communal-services RLUIPA and First Amendment claims, (2) Kosher-diet RLUIPA and First Amendment claims, (3) motion for appointment of counsel, (4) motion for class certification, and (5) motion for preliminary injunction. Williams v. Wilkinson, No. 15-7022, slip op. at 32 (10th Cir. Apr. 14, 2016) (Dkt. 58).

ACCORDINGLY, the defendants are directed to file within thirty (30) days a response to the remanded issues. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days to file a reply to the defendants' response, if appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of May 2016. Dated this 26th day of May, 2016.

/s/_________

Ronald A. White

United States District Judge

Eastern District of Oklahoma


Summaries of

Williams v. Wilkinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
May 26, 2016
No. CIV 13-206-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. May. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Williams v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:MARIO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. TIM WILKINSON and BRIAN WIDEMAN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: May 26, 2016

Citations

No. CIV 13-206-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. May. 26, 2016)