From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Wilhoit

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 13, 1977
234 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53793.

ARGUED APRIL 7, 1977.

DECIDED APRIL 13, 1977.

Action for damages. Clarke Superior Court. Before Judge Barrow.

Joseph P. Williams, pro se. Fortson, Bentley Griffin, J. Edward Allen, for appellee.


This is a pro se appeal in a civil case in which it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the legal issues sought to be raised, and in which no authority is cited and no pagination reference to the 3-inch record are made. Since this is a court for the correction of errors of law and none have affirmatively been made to appear by the record, we must presume the judgment to be correct. See Smith v. Forrester, 132 Ga. App. 426 (1) ( 208 S.E.2d 199) (1974).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

ARGUED APRIL 7, 1977 — DECIDED APRIL 13, 1977.


Summaries of

Williams v. Wilhoit

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 13, 1977
234 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Williams v. Wilhoit

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMS v. WILHOIT

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 13, 1977

Citations

234 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
234 S.E.2d 860

Citing Cases

Witlen v. Witlen

There is a presumption that the judgment below was correct. Williams v. Wilhoit, 142 Ga. App. 4 ( 234 S.E.2d…

Wetherington v. Koepenick Horne, Inc.

"There is a presumption that the judgment below was correct. Williams v. Wilhoit, 142 Ga. App. 4 ( 234 S.E.2d…