From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Werner Enters., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
May 31, 2018
Case No. 1:17-CV-189-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. May. 31, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:17-CV-189-SNLJ

05-31-2018

JAMIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., and JEFFERY O. MCGHEE Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on review of the file. This case was filed back in October 2017. To date, defendant Jeffery McGhee has not been served. Under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). On May 15, 2018, this Court gave plaintiff fourteen days to show good cause for why Mr. McGhee has not been served. The fourteen-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not shown good cause. Thus, Mr. McGhee is dismissed without prejudice.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice against Mr. McGhee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay in this case is lifted.

So ordered this 31st day of May 2018.

/s/_________

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Werner Enters., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
May 31, 2018
Case No. 1:17-CV-189-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. May. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Williams v. Werner Enters., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., and JEFFERY O…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 31, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:17-CV-189-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. May. 31, 2018)