Williams v. Waypoint Res. Grp., LLC

1 Citing case

  1. Furia v. Indep. Recovery Res.

    18-CV-6102 (SJF) (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2020)

    Moreover, IRR clearly identified itself as a collection agency and gave Furia an opportunity to challenge the charge. See Polizois v. Vengroff Williams, Inc., No. 16 CV 7011 JFB GRB, 2018 WL 1443875, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2018) ((holding that the collection letter is not open to more than one reasonable interpretation); Williams v. Waypoint Res. Grp., LLC, No. 18 CV 4921 ARR RML, 2019 WL 1368998 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2019)(granting defendant's motion to dismiss because the plaintiff's creditor was explicitly listed on the collection letter)). Although IRR used the word "Regarding" before Peconic's name, the undersigned does not agree that IRR failed to connect Peconic to the debt IRR was seeking to collect on its behalf.