From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Wasco State Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2015
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714(PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714(PC)

03-27-2015

LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

(ECF No. 9)

On March 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel. (ECF No. 9.)

Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require an attorney to represent plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525.

Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the court will seek volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In determining whether "exceptional circumstances exist, the district court must evaluate both the likelihood of success of the merits [and] the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved." Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff claims his inmate status will make it difficult for him to gather evidence and conduct discovery. However, Plaintiff faces no pending deadlines in this case, and he may request an extension of time if he has trouble meeting any deadlines that arise.

Even if it is assumed that plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that he has made serious allegations which, if proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is not exceptional. This court is faced with similar cases almost daily. Further, at this stage in the proceedings, the court cannot make a determination that plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits, and based on a review of the record in this case, the court does not find that plaintiff cannot adequately articulate his claims. Id.

Accordingly, the court will recommend that Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel be DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2015

/s/ Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Wasco State Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2015
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714(PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Williams v. Wasco State Prison

Case Details

Full title:LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714(PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2015)