From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2013
No. EDCV 12-625 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. EDCV 12-625 MWF (FFM)

2013-09-16

MICHAEL DEONTRAY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. IN RE TIM VIRGA, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed, with the following changes:

On page 11, lines 13, 14, and 15 of the Report and Recommendation delete "The California Supreme Court granted certification and as of the date of this Report, the matter is still pending. See Docket, Doe v. Harris, California Supreme Court Case No. S191948." and insert in its place: "The California Supreme Court granted certification and on July 1, 2013, filed its decision. The Harris decision confirmed that under California law 'the plea agreement will be 'deemed to incorporate and contemplate not only the
existing law but the reserve power of the state to amend the law or enact additional laws for the public good and in pursuance of public policy.'' Doe v. Harris, 57 Cal. 4th 64, 66 (2013) (quoting Gipson, 117 Cal. App. 4th at 1070).";
On page 11, line 16, delete "Nonetheless, the" and insert in its place: "The";
On page 11, line 22, before the sentence beginning on that line insert "In Doe v. Harris, the California Supreme Court approved the reasoning in Gipson. 57 Cal. 4th at 66.";
On page 11, line 24 after "Gipson" insert "and Harris".

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition on the merits with prejudice.

________________________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

United States District Judge
Presented by: ________________________
FREDERICK F. MUMM
United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2013
No. EDCV 12-625 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DEONTRAY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. IN RE TIM VIRGA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2013

Citations

No. EDCV 12-625 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2013)