From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 8, 2005
Nos. 97-CF-421, 97-CF-604 (D.C. Nov. 8, 2005)

Opinion

Nos. 97-CF-421, 97-CF-604

Filed November 8, 2005

F10817-95, F10818-95.

BEFORE: TERRY and RUIZ, Associate Judges; STEADMAN, Senior Judge.


ORDER


It is ORDERED, sua sponte, that this court's opinion filed October 13, 2005, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 25, delete the last sentence and cite to Harris v. United States, and replace with:

As noted, in opposing the motion to sever, the government did not assert that delay would prejudice its ability to present material evidence.

On page 27, footnote 19, add a new sentence at the end of the footnote:

And if the police officers who testified in the joint trial were no longer available for Smalls's separate new trial, their sworn cross-examined testimony from the previous joint trial could be introduced by the government. See Harris v. United States, 614 A.2d 1277, 1284 (D.C. 1992) (citing, inter alia, Federal Rule of Evidence 804 (b)(1), overruled on other grounds by Carter, 684 A.2d at 334).


Summaries of

Williams v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 8, 2005
Nos. 97-CF-421, 97-CF-604 (D.C. Nov. 8, 2005)
Case details for

Williams v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY V. WILLIAMS, Appellant, HERBERT SMALLS, JR., Appellant, v. UNITED…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 8, 2005

Citations

Nos. 97-CF-421, 97-CF-604 (D.C. Nov. 8, 2005)