From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Udell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 2, 1997
690 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

CASE NO. 96-0882

Opinion filed April 2, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Catherine M. Brunson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CL 95-4801 AI.

Russell L. Forkey of Russell L. Forkey, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Lynne K. Hennessey, Boca Raton, for appellee.


Under the facts of this case, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in striking appellant's pleadings as a sanction for failing to attend a mediation conference. The record does not demonstrate that level of misconduct which justifies the imposition of the severest of sanctions. See Roggemann v. Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Co., 670 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996);Townsend v. Feinberg, 659 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Other than the failure to attend mediation, the only misconduct relied upon by the trial court to justify the sanction was a failure to properly reply to a request for production. In response to an order compelling production, appellant prepared a two page handwritten memorandum, which he faxed to his attorney. The attorney then faxed his client's handwritten missive to opposing counsel, instead of working with appellant to prepare a proper response under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350. Both incidents of misconduct reflect derelictions of appellant's attorney, which do not support the striking of appellant's pleadings in this case. See Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1994); Crystal Lake Golf Course, Inc. v. Kalin, 252 So.2d 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Williams' appellate attorney did not handle the case at the trial level.

As to the order imposing sanctions for the failure to produce documents, we find no abuse of discretion. We reverse the final judgment, the partial final judgment in favor of plaintiff as to liability and the November 2, 1995 order granting plaintiffs' motion for sanctions. In light of the reversal, it is unnecessary to reach the other issue on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

POLEN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. Udell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 2, 1997
690 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Williams v. Udell

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. IRA UDELL and BROWARD EDUCATIONAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 2, 1997

Citations

690 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Martini v. Young

See Jimenez v. Simon, 879 So.2d 13 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (reversal of dismissal for discovery violations);…

Admore v. Hospice of Palm Beach Cnty.

Setting aside the fact that these cases are not binding on our Court, these cases addressed instances where…