From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILLIAMS v. THOR

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1474 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1474 LKK GGH P.

January 14, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ByOrder, filed October 23, 2007, certain of plaintiff's claims were dismissed from his amended complaint with leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff did not file a second amended complaint. The court finds the amended complaint should be served upon defendants only as to plaintiff's inadequate medical care claims.

By concurrently filed Findings and Recommendations, the court now recommends dismissal of the previously identified claims.

The amended complaint states a colorable claim for relief against defendants Dr. Parker, Dr. Thor, Dr. Traquina, Dr. Solomon, Dr. Naku for inadequate medical care for a serious medical condition in violation of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the amended complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Dr. Parker, Dr. Thor, Dr. Traquina, Dr. Solomon, Dr. Naku;

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff five (5) USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed February 5, 2007.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
b. One completed summons;
c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1 above; and
d. Six (6) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed February 5, 2007.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed _________________:1 5 6 February 5, 2007

____ completed summons form ____ completed USM-285 forms ____ copies of the Amended Complaint DATED: _______________________________ Plaintiff


Summaries of

WILLIAMS v. THOR

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1474 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2008)
Case details for

WILLIAMS v. THOR

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RAY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. DR. DANIEL THOR, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1474 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2008)