From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. The Kintock Grp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 2, 2022
Civil Action 20-1915 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-1915

08-02-2022

JAMES WILLIAMS v. THE KINTOCK GROUP, INC.


ORDER

Harvey Bartle III, Judge

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2022, for the reasons set forth in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The motion of defendant The Kintock Group, Inc. for summary judgment (Doc. #45) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

(2) Summary judgment is granted on Count II in favor of defendant The Kintock Group and against plaintiff James Williams as to plaintiff's claim under the Fourteenth Amendment.

(3) Summary judgment is granted on Count IV in favor of defendant The Kintock Group and against plaintiff James Williams as to plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.

(4) The motion of defendant is otherwise DENIED.


Summaries of

Williams v. The Kintock Grp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 2, 2022
Civil Action 20-1915 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. The Kintock Grp.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAMS v. THE KINTOCK GROUP, INC.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 2, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-1915 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2022)