From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Tesla, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
4:20-cv-08208-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

4:20-cv-08208-HSG

07-06-2021

ZACHERY WILLIAMS and MICHAEL MA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TESLA, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

McCUNE WRIGHT AREVALO, LLP Mark I. Richards Steven A. Haskins David C. Wright Attorneys for Plaintiffs ZACHERY WILLIAMS and MICHAEL MA SHOOK HARDY & BACON L.L.P. Amir Nassihi Michael L. Mallow Rachel A. Straus Nalani Crisologo Attorneys for Defendant TESLA, INC.


McCUNE WRIGHT AREVALO, LLP Mark I. Richards Steven A. Haskins David C. Wright Attorneys for Plaintiffs ZACHERY WILLIAMS and MICHAEL MA

SHOOK HARDY & BACON L.L.P. Amir Nassihi Michael L. Mallow Rachel A. Straus Nalani Crisologo Attorneys for Defendant TESLA, INC.

REVISED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CONTINUE TO STAY PLAINTIFF ZACHARY WILLIAMS' CLAIMS (AS MODIFIED)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Zachery Williams and Michael Ma (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Tesla Inc. (“Tesla”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, that:

WHEREAS, on November 20, 2020, Plaintiffs filed their complaint (Dkt. 1);

WHEREAS, on November 25, 2020, Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint (Dkt. 7);

WHEREAS, per the parties' stipulation, the Court continued the Case Management Conference, originally set for April 6, 2021, to July 6, 2021 to allow for the Court's decision on Tesla's motion to dismiss Ma's claims (Dkt. 34);

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the Court granted Tesla's motion to dismiss Ma's claims with leave to amend several of the claims within 28 days of the date of the order (Dkt. 44);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' deadline to file the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) is July 19, 2021;

WHEREA24S, the parties met and conferred and agree that it would promote judicial efficiency if the Court continues the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for July 6, 2021 to August 24, 2021 to allow Plaintiffs to file their SAC and to allow Tesla to evaluate the SAC;

WHEREAS, per the parties' stipulation, the Court stayed Plaintiff Williams' claims until after the Court issued its order on Tesla's motion to dismiss Plaintiff Ma's claims (Dkt No. 34);

WHEREAS, the parties stipulate and agree that it would conserve judicial and party resources and promote efficiency if the Court continue to stay Plaintiff Williams' claims until the Case Management Conference;

THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request the Court to order that:

(1) The Case Management Conference is continued to August 24, 2021 and
(2) Plaintiff Williams' claims are stayed until the Case Management Conference.

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

ORDER

Having considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause showing, the Court hereby orders the following:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

(3) The Case Management Conference is con1tinued to August 24, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. and
(4) Plaintiff Williams' claims are stayed until the Case Management Conference.


Summaries of

Williams v. Tesla, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
4:20-cv-08208-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Tesla, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ZACHERY WILLIAMS and MICHAEL MA, on behalf of themselves and all others…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

4:20-cv-08208-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)