From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Tate

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2008
No. CIV S-08-2242 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2242 KJM P.

October 20, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff's application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (docket no. 2) is dismissed without prejudice;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and

3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Williams v. Tate

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2008
No. CIV S-08-2242 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW TATE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2242 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)