Opinion
November, 1910.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., and Robson, J., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence establishes as matter of law that the note was usurious in its inception.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Williams v. Sweet
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Summaries of
Williams v. Sweet
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for
Williams v. Sweet
Case Details
Full title:Edwin H. Williams, as Executor, etc., of Mary Jerusha Lee Williams…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1910
Citations
140 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)