From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3088 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3088 GGH P.

February 16, 2011


ORDER


On December 7, 2010, plaintiff filed his consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #4). By order filed December 15, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the December 15th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the December 15th, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: February 16, 2011


Summaries of

Williams v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3088 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:MARIO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 16, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3088 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2011)