From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sutter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 7, 2017
Civ. No. 16-255 (BJR) (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2017)

Opinion

Civ. No. 16-255 (BJR)

08-07-2017

ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KEVIN SUTTER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, and no objections having been filed, HEREBY ORDERS:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (ECF 20) is GRANTED.

(3) The amended petition for habeas corpus (ECF 12) is DENIED.

(4) A certificate of appealability is DENIED with respect to all claims.

(5) The case is CLOSED.

(6) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the parties.

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 7th day of August, 2017.

/s/

Barbara Jacobs Rothstein

U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Sutter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 7, 2017
Civ. No. 16-255 (BJR) (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. Sutter

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KEVIN SUTTER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2017

Citations

Civ. No. 16-255 (BJR) (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2017)