From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sunrise Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 8, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01432-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 8, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01432-APG-NJK

05-08-2020

JEREMY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case

[ECF No. 7]

On April 17, 2020, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice to the plaintiff filing his lawsuit in state court because it is clear no subject matter jurisdiction exists in this court. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff Jeremy Williams did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe's report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is accepted and plaintiff Jeremy Williams' amended complaint (ECF No. 5) is dismissed without prejudice to him filing it in state court. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 8th day of May, 2020.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Sunrise Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 8, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01432-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. Sunrise Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 8, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01432-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 8, 2020)